SC refuses to entertain plea over deportation drive in Assam, asks petitioner to approach HC
It alleged that deportation orders were applied indiscriminately, without proper ID checks or notices, leading to Indian citizens being wrongly jailed and threatened with unlawful removal to foreign countries.
PTI
-
The Supreme Court of India
New Delhi, 2 June
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea which
alleged that the Assam government has reportedly launched a
"sweeping" drive to detain and deport persons suspected to be
foreigners without nationality verification or exhaustion of legal remedies.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told
the petitioner to approach the Gauhati High Court in the matter.
"Why are you not going to the Gauhati High Court?" the
bench asked senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, who appeared for petitioner All BTC
Minority Students Union.
Hegde said the plea was based on an order passed by the apex court
earlier.
"Please go to the Gauhati High Court," the bench
observed.
Hegde said the petitioner would withdraw the plea to take
appropriate recourse before the high court.
The bench allowed him to withdraw the plea.
The plea, filed through advocate Adeel Ahmed, referred to a 4 February order of the top court which, while dealing with a separate
petition, had directed Assam to initiate the process of deportation of 63
declared foreign nationals, whose nationality was known, within two weeks.
"Pursuant to the said order (of 4 February )... the state of
Assam has reportedly launched a sweeping and indiscriminate drive to detain and
deport individuals suspected to be foreigners, even in the absence of
foreigners tribunal declarations, nationality verification, or exhaustion of
legal remedies," the plea claimed.
It referred to news reports, including one about a retired school
teacher who was allegedly "pushed back" into Bangladesh.
"These instances reflect a growing pattern of deportations
conducted by the Assam Police and administrative machinery through informal
'push back' mechanisms, without any judicial oversight or adherence to the
safeguards envisaged by the Constitution of India or this court," it
claimed.
"The 'push back' policy, as implemented, violates Articles 14
and 21 of the Constitution by deporting individuals without due process,
thereby denying them the opportunity to contest their deportation and
infringing upon their right to life and personal liberty," the plea
claimed.
It alleged that the indiscriminate application of deportation
directives, coupled with absence of proper identification, verification and
notice mechanisms, has resulted in a situation where Indian citizens were being
wrongfully incarcerated and threatened with removal to foreign territories
without lawful basis.
The plea sought a direction that no person shall be deported
pursuant to the 4 February order without a prior reasoned declaration by the
foreigners tribunal, without adequate opportunity of appeal or review and
verification of nationality by the Ministry of External Affairs.
It also sought a declaration that the "push back" policy
adopted by Assam was violative of Articles 14 (equality before law) and 21
(protection of life and personal liberty) of the Constitution and contrary to
binding judicial precedents
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *