Kolhapuri chappal row: PIL in HC against Prada for 'unauthorised use'; seeks compensation
The petition has been filed against the Prada Group and various Maharashtra government authorities.
PTI
-
Photo: @prada/Insta
Mumbai,
4 July
A PIL has been filed in the Bombay High Court against Italian
fashion house Prada for its alleged unauthorised use of the Kolhapuri chappals,
and sought compensation to be paid to Indian artisans for allegedly copying
their design.
Prada
in its spring/summer collection showcased their 'toe-ring sandals', which the
petition said are deceptively similar to the Kolhapur chappal. These sandals
are priced at Rs 1 lakh per pair.
"The
Kolhapuri chappal is the cultural symbol of Maharashtra," the plea filed
by six Pune-based lawyers said.
The
petition has been filed against the Prada Group and various Maharashtra
government authorities.
It
has sought a direction to Prada from commercialising and using its 'toe-ring
sandals' without any authorisation, and for the fashion group to issue a public
apology and acknowledge the use of Kolhapuri chappals.
The
plea said the Kolhapuri chappal (slippers) is already protected as a
Geographical Indication (GI) under the Geographical Indications of Goods
(Registration and Protection) Act.
"The
court shall also order a permanent injunction against Prada's unauthorised GI
use and to compensate the artisans' community for reputational and economic
damages," the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) said.
It
also sought an inquiry against Prada for violating the rights of GI-registered
proprietors and the artisans' community.
By
way of interim order, the PIL has sought damages and compensation to be paid to
the artisans' community, including a temporary injunction restraining Prada
from marketing, selling or exporting their sandals.
It
added that Prada has privately accepted that its collection has been inspired by Indian artisans but has not yet issued any formal apology or compensation to
the original artisans.
"The
private acknowledgement appears to be merely a superficial attempt to deflect
criticism," the PIL said.
The
petitioners sought a direction to the authorities to ensure and protect the
rights of the community and to grant compensation.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *