‘Doesn't promote smoking': SC refuses to ban cover of Arundhati Roy's memoir
SC says Arundhati Roy’s memoir cover does not advertise smoking and upholds the Kerala High Court ruling dismissing plea for a ban.
ANI
-
Creative freedom wins as SC rejects plea to ban Arundhati Roy’s memoir cover (ANI)
New Delhi, 5 Dec
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking a
ban on Arundhati Roy’s memoir Mother Mary Comes to Me, rejecting claims that
the book’s cover featuring the author smoking a cigarette or beedi violates
central law by promoting tobacco use.
A bench
of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi ruled that the
cover image does not encourage smoking and therefore does not breach Section 5
of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), 2003. The bench noted
that the book already carries a disclaimer clarifying the intent.
“The
book, the photograph, the publisher or the author, none of these persons have
anything to do with promoting cigarettes. She is a renowned author. Even the
publisher is renowned. It is not an advertisement for cigarettes,” the Court
observed.
The
petitioner had approached the Supreme Court challenging the Kerala High Court’s
decision that rejected a similar plea. The petitioner argued that the cover
lacked a visible health warning and could mislead the public, especially in the
absence of strong restrictions on tobacco imagery.
However,
the Supreme Court agreed with the High Court’s view that the photograph is not
used for commercial advertising but appears on a literary product meant for
readers who consciously choose to purchase the memoir. The bench emphasised
that the image does not feature in public promotional material such as
hoardings or banners, further weakening the claim of commercial tobacco
promotion.
“The
picture in the book does not constitute any violation… We don't see any reason
to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court,” the Court
added, dismissing the appeal after hearing arguments briefly.
The ruling reaffirms that artistic and literary expression, when not designed to market tobacco, remains protected and should not be restricted without strong legal grounds. The Supreme Court’s verdict upholds Kerala High Court’s position, allowing the sale and distribution of Roy’s memoir to continue without any changes to its cover.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




