'The Kerala Story 2’ pleas are misconceived: Producer to Kerala HC
The film's producer has denied the allegations in the pleas against the movie and termed them as an abuse and misuse of the process of law.
PTI
-
The submission was made by the film's producer, Vipul Amrutlal Shah, in an affidavit filed in the Kerala High Court (ANI)
Kochi, 25 Feb
The producer of 'The Kerala Story 2 - Goes Beyond' has told the Kerala High Court that the pleas opposing the film's release were "premature, misconceived and not maintainable".
The
submission was made by the film's producer, Vipul Amrutlal Shah, in an affidavit
filed in the High Court on Tuesday.
On
Wednesday, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas said he will hear the petitions in
detail at 3pm.
Shah, in
his affidavit, has also contended that the censor board, CBFC, was the sole
expert authority constituted under the Cinematograph Act, 1952, to examine
films in their entirety and certify them for public exhibition.
"The
supervisory jurisdiction of this court does not extend to substituting its own
assessment of a film's content for the expert judgment of the certifying
authority," he has said in his affidavit.
He has
also denied the allegations in the pleas against the movie and termed them as
"an abuse and misuse of the process of law".
Referring
to the plea by the first petitioner, Sreedev Namboodiri of Kannavam in Kannur
district, Shah has claimed that it was filed "with a malicious intention
and an ulterior motive to gain financial benefits from him".
The
producer has said that the teasers of the film were released 16 days before the
filing of the plea.
He has
also said that the exhibition of a certified film cannot be restrained based on a two-minute teaser alone, without any examination of the complete film.
He has
also said that granting prior restraint at the threshold without examining the
complete film, without any prima facie finding of legal infirmity in the CBFC's
decision, and based on a teaser "would be to visit catastrophic and
irreversible economic harm upon the respondent (producer), thousands of
exhibitors, and distribution partners across the country".
"The
said film is slated to release in over 1,800 theatres across India as well as
overseas," Shah has claimed.
Regarding
the film's title, he has said that the qualifier 'Goes Beyond' in the film's
name was "not decorative".
"It
is a deliberate and conspicuous textual signal, prominently displayed in the
teaser at multiple timestamps, that the film's narrative extends beyond the
geography of Kerala.
"The
definite article 'The' in the title is a reference to the first film in the
franchise and does not restrict the film's subject matter to Kerala
alone," the affidavit has claimed.
He also
said that if there was an apprehension of mob action or protest affecting
public order, it was for the state to take steps to prevent the same and it cannot
result in stopping the release of a film.
"A
scenario where any individual or group can effectively veto the exhibition of a
certified film simply by threatening disorder would render meaningless both the
CBFC certification process and the constitutional guarantee of free
expression," the affidavit said.
The
court had on Tuesday orally observed that the teaser and trailers of the movie depict a state like Kerala, where everyone lives in communal harmony, in a wrong light.
The
court had also observed that using the state's name and claiming the film is
based on facts can lead to communal tensions in the state.
The
three separate pleas have sought to quash the certificate for public viewing
granted to 'The Kerala Story 2 - Goes Beyond', which is scheduled to be
released on 27 February.
One of
the three pleas has been moved by Sreedev Namboodiri of Kannavam in Kannur
district, who has arrayed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the
Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), and producer Vipul Amrutlal Shah as
respondents in his writing petition filed last week.
Besides
quashing its certification, Namboodiri's petition, filed through advocate
Maitreyi Sachidananda Hegde, also seeks certain modifications, including
reconsideration of its title.
The
petitioner has claimed that the film was certified for public viewing by the
CBFC, allegedly without due compliance with the statutory mandate under the
Cinematograph Act, 1952.
According
to the petition, the grievance arises from the teaser and trailer of the film,
which portray narratives involving women from multiple states, yet brand the
content as 'The Kerala Story', thereby associating alleged incidents of
terrorism, forced conversion, and demographic conspiracy exclusively to the
state of Kerala.
"Such
a portrayal has the potential to stigmatise an entire regional population,
disturb public order, and incite communal and regional disharmony", the
petition has said.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




