https://www.salarnews.in/public/uploads/images/advertisment/1756994003_header_Screenshot 2025-09-04 182836.png

Don't be sentimental: SC junks plea against Cockroach Janata Party

CJP emerged after controversy over remarks attributed to CJI during a 15 May hearing on lawyer designation.

PTI

https://www.salarnews.in/public/uploads/images/newsimages/maannewsimage25052026_171440_WEb pics (13).png
  • The court said there was no grave urgency in the matter & advised the petitioner not to take the issue so sentimentally (PTI/Screengrab)

New Delhi, 25 May 


The Supreme Court on Monday refused to grant an urgent hearing on a plea seeking a probe into allegations regarding fake advocates and activities associated with the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), a satirical digital outfit that recently took social media by storm.

 

A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi asked advocate NK Goswami, appearing for the petitioner, not to take the issue "so sentimentally."

 

Goswami submitted that despite the CJI's clarification, a distorted and malicious narrative was continuing.

 

"Don't take it so sentimentally," the CJI said.

 

Another advocate submitted that they were seeking a CBI probe into the issue of fake law degrees and said courtroom exchanges cannot be used for commercial purposes.

 

The CJI replied, "There is no such grave urgency. We will see."

 

The petition has also sought action against those involved in the alleged commercial exploitation of oral observations made during court proceedings. It sought an investigation into alleged fake advocates practising law using fraudulent degrees.

 

Expressing concern over the misuse of judicial proceedings, the plea claimed that remarks and observations made during the court proceedings were being used for publicity campaigns.

 

The CJP surfaced recently amid a controversy over remarks attributed to CJI Surya Kant on "cockroaches" and "parasites" during a court hearing on 15 May on a plea concerning senior designation for a lawyer.

 

On 16 May, the CJI issued a strongly worded clarification of his remarks, saying he was "pained" by media reports suggesting he had criticised the youth.

 

He had emphasised that his remarks were specifically directed at individuals entering the legal profession through "fake and bogus degrees" and were "misquoted by a section of the media".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *