Bidadi township row: HDK challenges CM DKS for open debate
HDK asked DKS to come to Byramangala, where farmers have been protesting, whenever he was free.
PTI
-
HD Kumaraswamy said 80–90% of farmers oppose the project & asked why the CM won't withdraw it (X/@hd_kumaraswamy/PTI)
Bengaluru, 22 June
JD(S) leader HD Kumaraswamy on Monday challenged Karnataka Chief Minister DK Shivakumar to an open debate on the proposed GBIT project near Bidadi in Bengaluru South district, and the government's land acquisition for it.
He asked
the CM to come to Byramangala, where farmers have been protesting, whenever he
was free.
Claiming
that 80-90 per cent of local farmers remain opposed to the township project and
that more than 4,000 farmers have filed objections since the government issued
its preliminary notification, the Union Minister criticised the administration
for allegedly failing to respond to those objections and asked: "Is this
what public service means?"
"A
challenge was thrown for a debate (from Shivakumar). Come, let's go to
Byramangala and see whether the farmers have really consented to give up their
land for the project," Kumaraswamy said.
Speaking
to reporters here, he said, "I'm free, you (Shivakumar) are running a
government and will be busy until midnight 12 or 1. So I had said that whenever
you make time and fix a schedule, I would come for a discussion. I'm saying the
same thing even now: I'm free, and I can come any time. I never said I would not
come. He (CM) is busy. I'm not as busy as he is. So amid his busy schedule, if
he comes, I'm ready at any time."
"Let's
go to the people at Byramangala, where women and the elderly have been sitting in protest for over 450 days. Let's discuss in front of them," he added.
However,
Shivakumar, not willing to respond in detail, said, " Let JD(S) MLAs raise the
issue during the upcoming Assembly session, and he would reply to them.
"I
will not say anything. He (Kumaraswamy) did not come when I called (for a
debate). There is an Assembly, where he can make his experienced politicians
(MLAs) speak. Will respond to them... I wish them all the best," he told
reporters.
Despite
opposition from sections of farmers and villagers, a final notification was
recently issued for the acquisition of 499 acres across three villages in
Ramanagara and Harohalli taluks for the Greater Bengaluru Integrated Township,
one of Shivakumar's ambitious projects, projected as India's "first
AI-powered integrated township".
The
project is expected to cover a total of 7,481 acres across nine villages in the
region, sources said, adding that the notification issued recently is likely to
be the first in a series of land acquisition notifications expected in the
coming days.
Alleging
that the project-related work is not happening at the government offices but at
a rented house at Nagarbhavi in Bengaluru, Kumaraswamy said the transactions
are happening with some mafia elements around.
"The
project-related work is not happening at the DC office... Be prepared for how
many of you will have to go to jail. I know things very well," he said.
Accusing
the government of acting as a broker for real-estate interests by attempting to
take away fertile agricultural land from innocent farmers and hand it over to
land developers, the union minister said many leaders who now support the
project, including the Chief Minister, had strongly opposed it in the Assembly
earlier.
"Shivakumar,
former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge
had all vehemently opposed the Bidadi project in the past. Those who once
opposed it loudly are now supporting it, which is a clear contradiction,"
he said, questioning Kharge and Siddaramaiah's silence.
Acknowledging
that he was the architect of the proposal to develop five townships, including
Bidadi, when he was CM, to reduce pressure on Bengaluru,
Kumaraswamy said, "I never intended to take farmers' land and hand it over
to real-estate developers. When farmers opposed the project, I abandoned it
without hesitation."
He claimed
that even today, 80–90 per cent of farmers oppose the project and questioned
why the Chief Minister cannot drop it.
Recalling
that the Congress leaders strongly opposed the project, citing concerns about
farmers, fertile agricultural land, forests, and trees, when he first proposed
it, the JD(S) leader said the national party even formed a fact-finding committee
led by senior HK Patil, which visited Bidadi, Solur, Kasaba, Hosakote, and
other places to investigate the issue.
Referring
to Shivakumar's statement in the Assembly on August 1, 2007, where he had
allegedly criticised the proposed project, he wondered how the same leader who
once spoke passionately about protecting fertile agricultural land and farmers
is now pursuing the project.
According
to him, based on information received, during the upcoming expansion of
Shivakumar's cabinet, it has been decided that 5 percent of the vacant berths
will be "government seats"—he is unsure if these will be filled based
on merit or service to the party—while the remaining 95 per cent are all
"management seats," which are "vasooli (collection) seats"
or "payment quota".
Noting that such discussions are ongoing in the Congress party, he said, "Someone told me during cabinet expansion, 5 per cent is government quota, and the remaining 95 per cent is management quota. What does that mean? I, too, did not understand when I heard. Such management and government quotas are seen in medical and engineering seats. But here it seems that there is a government and management seat demarcation even to join the cabinet. Where will donations given for management seats go?"
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




