SC rejects plea against film title ‘Yadav Ji ki Love Story’
The petitioner alleged that the film title stereotypes the community and objected to the portrayal of the female lead.
PTI
-
SC says ‘Yadav Ji ki Love Story’ does not portray the Yadav community in a bad light (Screengrab)
New Delhi, 25 Feb
The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a plea seeking a ban or a change in the title of the upcoming film 'Yadav Ji ki Love Story,' saying the name does not portray the Yadav community in a poor light.
A bench
comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan rejected the petition filed
by the chief of the Vishwa Yadav Parishad.
It
perused the material on record and noted that the main grievance was that the name
of the film reflected the Yadav community in a bad light in society.
“Therefore,
the contention is that the name of the film is to be changed. We fail to
understand how the title of a film can reflect the community in a bad
light. The title of the film nowhere has no adjective or word that
portrays the Yadav community in a bad light,” Justice Nagarathna said.
The
bench termed the apprehensions as “wholly unfounded” and distinguished its
earlier order in a similar case related to ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ in which it had
asked the producer to change the title of that movie.
“The
expression ‘ghooskhor’ in English means corrupt. Therefore, a negative meaning
was being attached to the community. In the instant case, no such negativity is
attached to the Yadav community. Neither of the reasonable restrictions under
Article 19(2) (reasonable restrictions to freedom of speech and expression)
under the Constitution is attracted. The name in no way portrays the Yadav
community in a bad light or any negative way. The writ petition is accordingly
dismissed,” the order said.
The
petitioner had alleged that the title created an offensive stereotype against
the community and raised concerns over the depiction of the female lead.
During
the hearing, the counsel for the petitioner argued that while they do not
oppose inter-community marriages, the film’s portrayal of a woman was
unacceptable.
"A
lady cannot be publicised this way," the counsel said, adding that the
film claims to be based on a true story.
However,
the bench remained unconvinced, categorising the film as a work of fiction.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




